Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HURST v. POWELL, 7:13-CV-1 (HL). (2013)

Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia Number: infdco20130905a87 Visitors: 28
Filed: Sep. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2013
Summary: ORDER HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge. This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 34) in which he recommends that 1) Plaintiff's first amendment to his complaint (Doc. 20) be dismissed without prejudice; 2) Defendant Nurse Winnie Olson be dismissed from this action; 3) Plaintiff's second motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 21) be denied; and 4) Plaintiff's third motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 24) be denied; and 5) Plaintiff's
More

ORDER

HUGH LAWSON, Senior Judge.

This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 34) in which he recommends that 1) Plaintiff's first amendment to his complaint (Doc. 20) be dismissed without prejudice; 2) Defendant Nurse Winnie Olson be dismissed from this action; 3) Plaintiff's second motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 21) be denied; and 4) Plaintiff's third motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 24) be denied; and 5) Plaintiff's motion for a speedy trial (Doc. 24-1) be denied. Because no objection to the Recommendation has been filed, the Court reviews for clear error and finds none. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted in full. Accordingly, the Court orders the following:

1. Plaintiff's first amendment to his complaint (Doc. 20) is dismissed without prejudice. 2. Defendant Nurse Winnie Olson is dismissed from this action. 3. Plaintiff's second motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 21) is denied. 4. Plaintiff's third motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 24) is denied. 5. Plaintiff's motion for a speedy trial (Doc. 24-1) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer