Transcend Insights, Inc v. Healogics, Inc., 3:17-CV-04068-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171026c00
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2017
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S INITIAL RESPONSE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Stipulation of Defendant Healogics, Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Transcend Insights, Inc. ("Plaintiff") (Defendant and Plaintiff, collectively, the "Parties"), to grant Defendant an additional extension of time of 15 days, fro
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S INITIAL RESPONSE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Stipulation of Defendant Healogics, Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Transcend Insights, Inc. ("Plaintiff") (Defendant and Plaintiff, collectively, the "Parties"), to grant Defendant an additional extension of time of 15 days, from..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S INITIAL RESPONSE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Stipulation of Defendant Healogics, Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Transcend Insights, Inc. ("Plaintiff") (Defendant and Plaintiff, collectively, the "Parties"), to grant Defendant an additional extension of time of 15 days, from October 25, 2017 through and including November 9, 2017, within which to attempt to settle this action before filing and serving its initial response to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint") on file in this action.
The Parties further stipulate that in the event the Parties do not settle, and Defendant's response consists of a motion to stay, transfer or dismiss this Action, than an answer, Plaintiff shall have 30 days in which to file its opposition hereto.
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and Declaration in support thereof, and for good cause shown, hereby orders as follows:
1. Defendant shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than November 9, 2017.
2. In the event that Defendant's response to the Complaint consists of a motion to stay, transfer or dismiss the action, Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date such motion is filed and served in which to file its opposition or other response thereto.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
