Hawkins v. City of Dixon, Case No: 3:18 CV 50085. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20181108i96
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [38] by the magistrate judge that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, t
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [38] by the magistrate judge that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, th..
More
ORDER
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [38] by the magistrate judge that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is closed.
Source: Leagle
