Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: May 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff/Counter Defendants CHEMEON Surface Technology and Counter Defendants Dean S. Meiling and Madylon Meiling (collectively "CHEMEON"), by and through their undersigned counsel, Robert C. Ryan of Holland & Hart, LLP; Defendants Metalast International, Inc., Metalast, Inc., Sierra Dorado, Inc., David M. Semas, and Counterclaimants Metalast Internatio
Summary: STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff/Counter Defendants CHEMEON Surface Technology and Counter Defendants Dean S. Meiling and Madylon Meiling (collectively "CHEMEON"), by and through their undersigned counsel, Robert C. Ryan of Holland & Hart, LLP; Defendants Metalast International, Inc., Metalast, Inc., Sierra Dorado, Inc., David M. Semas, and Counterclaimants Metalast Internation..
More
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER [FIRST REQUEST]
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff/Counter Defendants CHEMEON Surface Technology and Counter Defendants Dean S. Meiling and Madylon Meiling (collectively "CHEMEON"), by and through their undersigned counsel, Robert C. Ryan of Holland & Hart, LLP; Defendants Metalast International, Inc., Metalast, Inc., Sierra Dorado, Inc., David M. Semas, and Counterclaimants Metalast International, Inc. and David M. Semas (collectively "Metalast Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, Michael D. Hoy of Hoy Chrissinger Kimmel Vallas, PC, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On April 2, 2018, the Court entered its Minute Order In Chambers (ECF No. 400) directing the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order to be filed within 60 days.
2. Pursuant to the Minute Order, the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order is due June 1, 2018.
3. Currently still pending before the Court are the following briefs and motions:
a. supplemental briefing by the parties on the cancellation claim/fraudulent renewal at ECF Nos. 354, 356, and 404 and 405; and
b. motion for reconsideration briefing by the parties at ECF Nos. 412, 413, and 417.
4. The parties agree to extend the deadline within which to file the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order to 30 days after the Court enters its rulings on the pending matters identified in paragraph 3 above.
5. This extension is agreed to and requested based on the Court's response to the parties' joint inquiry to the Court concerning the deadline to file the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order.
6. This is the first request for an extension of time to file the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order.
7. This request for an extension is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
