APD TECH, LLC v. EMERITUS EQUITY HOLDINGS, LLC, 4:16-CV-0895. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20171103k93
Visitors: 127
Filed: Nov. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION MELINDA HARMON , District Judge . Pending in the above-referenced cause is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Answers (Document No. 122), in which Plaintiffs seek an Order striking the Answers of Defendants Donald Kelly (Document No. 114), Lynn Kelly (Document No. 115), and David Anchim (Document No. 119), arguing that the Answers are untimely and come several weeks after the Clerk entered defaults against Defendants Donald Kelly, Lynn Kel
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION MELINDA HARMON , District Judge . Pending in the above-referenced cause is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Answers (Document No. 122), in which Plaintiffs seek an Order striking the Answers of Defendants Donald Kelly (Document No. 114), Lynn Kelly (Document No. 115), and David Anchim (Document No. 119), arguing that the Answers are untimely and come several weeks after the Clerk entered defaults against Defendants Donald Kelly, Lynn Kell..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending in the above-referenced cause is Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Answers (Document No. 122), in which Plaintiffs seek an Order striking the Answers of Defendants Donald Kelly (Document No. 114), Lynn Kelly (Document No. 115), and David Anchim (Document No. 119), arguing that the Answers are untimely and come several weeks after the Clerk entered defaults against Defendants Donald Kelly, Lynn Kelly, and David Anchim. Defendants filed separate Motions for Denial of Motion to Strike Defendants' Ansers (Document Nos. 123, 124, 125). On August 8, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued her Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike be granted, and that Defendants' Motion for Denial be denied. (Document No. 127). Defendants filed no objections to the Judge's M&R, and upon review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions. Accordingly, the Court hereby
ORDERS that the Memorandum and Recommendation (Document No. 127) is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Answers (Document No. 122) is GRANTED and Defendants' Motions for Denial of Motion to Strike Defendants' Answers (Document Nos. 123, 124, 125) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
