Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crussen v. Social Security, Commissioner of, 12-12964. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180131h84 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#22] TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION OF ATTORNEY FEES [#18] DENISE PAGE HOOD , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (Doc # 22) filed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen on Plaintiff Barbara Lynn Crussen's Counsel's Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees (Doc # 18). To date, no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to file such has
More

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#22] TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION OF ATTORNEY FEES [#18]

This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (Doc # 22) filed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen on Plaintiff Barbara Lynn Crussen's Counsel's Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees (Doc # 18). To date, no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to file such has passed. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and GRANTS Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion.

The background facts of this matter are adequately set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Court adopts them here.

The standard of review by the district court when examining a Report and Recommendation is set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636. This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or the specified proposed findings or recommendations to which an objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. In order to preserve the right to appeal the magistrate judge's recommendation, a party must file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of service of the Report and Recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Howard v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505, 508-09 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

After review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that his findings and conclusions are correct.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen's Report and Recommendation (Doc # 22) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Barbara Lynn Crussen's Counsel's Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees (Doc # 18) is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer