AYERS v. AYERS, 11-2208. (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20120326a92
Visitors: 31
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief District Judge. On February 22, 2012, Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Report and Recommendation (#12) in this case. Judge Bernthal recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6) be denied. Neither party filed an objection to Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#12) within fourteen days after being served with a copy, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), therefore both parties have waived any objections to the denial of the motion to dism
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief District Judge. On February 22, 2012, Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Report and Recommendation (#12) in this case. Judge Bernthal recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6) be denied. Neither party filed an objection to Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#12) within fourteen days after being served with a copy, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), therefore both parties have waived any objections to the denial of the motion to dismi..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, Chief District Judge.
On February 22, 2012, Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal filed a Report and Recommendation (#12) in this case. Judge Bernthal recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6) be denied. Neither party filed an objection to Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#12) within fourteen days after being served with a copy, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), therefore both parties have waived any objections to the denial of the motion to dismiss on appeal. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). This court has carefully reviewed Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#12). Following this careful and thorough review, this court agrees with and accepts Judge Bernthal's Report and Recommendation (#12).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (#12) is accepted by this court.
(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#6) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
