SCOTT v. ASTRUE, 2:11-cv-00489. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120522a86
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 21, 2012
Latest Update: May 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's April 2, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and REMANDS this case. On remand, the administrative law judge must evaluate the evidence with respect to plaintiff's physical impairments, compare it to the Listings and provide a rationale for his decis
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's April 2, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and REMANDS this case. On remand, the administrative law judge must evaluate the evidence with respect to plaintiff's physical impairments, compare it to the Listings and provide a rationale for his decisi..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's April 2, 2012 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and REMANDS this case. On remand, the administrative law judge must evaluate the evidence with respect to plaintiff's physical impairments, compare it to the Listings and provide a rationale for his decision to allow for meaningful judicial review; evaluate Ms. Sayre- Butt's opinion in accordance with Social Security Ruling 06-03p; and present the vocational expert with a hypothetical that represents all of plaintiff's limitations.
Source: Leagle
