Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Holland v. Deal, 1:15-CV-1867-TWT. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20180801a89 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. , District Judge . This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 42] of the Magistrate Judge recommending dismissing the action for failure to state a claim. As set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff is required to register as a sex offender by the provisions of O.C.G.A. 42-1-12(e)(3). His objection that he is not required to register under O.C.G.A. 42
More

ORDER

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 42] of the Magistrate Judge recommending dismissing the action for failure to state a claim. As set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff is required to register as a sex offender by the provisions of O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12(e)(3). His objection that he is not required to register under O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12(e)(1) is without merit because the registration requirements are stated in the disjunctive. There is no constitutional issue with respect to applying the registration requirement to those released from prison after the enactment of the statute. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. This action is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer