Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM . In 43408, Brody McEwen Trout pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, felony, Idaho Code 18-3316, and the district court imposed a determinate five-year sentence to run concurrently with his sentences in 43409. In 43409, Trout pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methadone, felony, I.C. 37-2732(c)(1), and two counts of robbery, felony, I.C. 18-6501, 18-6502, and the district c
Summary: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY PER CURIAM . In 43408, Brody McEwen Trout pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, felony, Idaho Code 18-3316, and the district court imposed a determinate five-year sentence to run concurrently with his sentences in 43409. In 43409, Trout pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methadone, felony, I.C. 37-2732(c)(1), and two counts of robbery, felony, I.C. 18-6501, 18-6502, and the district co..
More
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
PER CURIAM.
In 43408, Brody McEwen Trout pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, felony, Idaho Code § 18-3316, and the district court imposed a determinate five-year sentence to run concurrently with his sentences in 43409. In 43409, Trout pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methadone, felony, I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1), and two counts of robbery, felony, I.C. §§ 18-6501, 18-6502, and the district court imposed a determinate five-year sentence and two unified life sentences, with eight years determinate, respectively, with the sentences running concurrently.1 Trout appeals, contending that his sentences are excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Trout's judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
