United States v. Cao, 3:05cr99/LAC/EMT (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20191114881
Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 8, 2019. (ECF No. 679). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have conducted a de novo review of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, a
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 8, 2019. (ECF No. 679). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have conducted a de novo review of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, an..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 8, 2019. (ECF No. 679). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have conducted a de novo review of the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 679) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant Cao's "Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody" (ECF No. 678) is summarily dismissed because the court does not have jurisdiction to consider the motion.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
