BAGLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-346. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150106d45
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's December 8, 2014 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 20.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court sustain Plaintiff's statement of errors to the extent that the case would be remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration of the inconsistent opinions of Dr. Alex Simpson pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Report and Recommendation
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's December 8, 2014 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 20.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court sustain Plaintiff's statement of errors to the extent that the case would be remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration of the inconsistent opinions of Dr. Alex Simpson pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Report and Recommendation ..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's December 8, 2014 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 20.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court sustain Plaintiff's statement of errors to the extent that the case would be remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration of the inconsistent opinions of Dr. Alex Simpson pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that a failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days would "result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation." (ECF No. 20, at Page ID # 788.)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have been filed, that the time for filing objections has expired, and that the Magistrate Judge's reasoning is correct, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, REVERSES the Commissioner's decision, and REMANDS the case pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration of Dr. Simpson's opinions. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case on the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
