Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gehrke v. Saul, 18-cv-1800-pp. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20190813f67 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 22), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On August 2, 2019, the parties filed a stipulated motion to remand this case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 22. The court GRANTS the stipulated motion for remand, and ORDERS that: The Commissioner of Social Security's denial of benefits is REVERSED and this case
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 22), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. §405(g)

On August 2, 2019, the parties filed a stipulated motion to remand this case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Dkt. No. 22. The court GRANTS the stipulated motion for remand, and ORDERS that:

The Commissioner of Social Security's denial of benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. On judicial remand, an administrative law judge will hold a new administrative hearing. The ALJ will consider Dr. Orton's opinion, plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and his step five finding. The ALJ will issue a de novo decision consistent with all applicable rules and regulations.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer