Filed: Aug. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEADLINE (FIRST REQUEST) BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, plaintiff James Ku ("Plaintiff") and defendants Equifax Information Services LLC ("Equifax") and Trans Union LLC (together with Plaintiff, the "Parties") 1 , by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order in the January 25, 2019 Scheduling
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEADLINE (FIRST REQUEST) BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, plaintiff James Ku ("Plaintiff") and defendants Equifax Information Services LLC ("Equifax") and Trans Union LLC (together with Plaintiff, the "Parties") 1 , by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order in the January 25, 2019 Scheduling O..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEADLINE
(FIRST REQUEST)
BRENDA WEKSLER, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, plaintiff James Ku ("Plaintiff") and defendants Equifax Information Services LLC ("Equifax") and Trans Union LLC (together with Plaintiff, the "Parties")1, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order in the January 25, 2019 Scheduling Order ["Order," Dkt. 45] as follows:
1. Defendants filed their respective Motions for Summary Judgment ("Motions") on July 19, 2019, the deadline set forth in the Order. [Dkt. 67, 68].
2. The current deadline for filing responses to the Motions is August 5, 2019. (Id.)
3. The presumptive current deadline for filing replies in support of the Motions, and the current deadline for a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order, is August 23, 2019. [Dkt. 45].
4. Because the Motions will not be ripe for ruling until after the current deadline for the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order has passed, the Parties believe it would be most efficient for the Court and the Parties if the due dates for the Joint Pretrial Order and any other trial-related deadlines, including the trial date, were continued pending a ruling on the Motions.
5. WHEREAS, no prejudice will occur to this Court or the Parties if granted, good cause supports this request to extend the deadline for a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order:
6. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows:
7. The January 25, 2019 Scheduling Order shall be amended as follows: Joint Proposed Pretrial Order: Due 30 days after rulings on Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment have been entered.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 1, 2019.
MARX LAW FIRM, PLLC
By: /s/Bradley M. Marx
Bradley M. Marx, Esq.
601 S. 10th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff James Ku
ALVERSON TAYLOR SANDERS
By: /s/Taylor Waite
Kurt Bonds, Esq.
Taylor Waite, Esq.
Alverson Taylor & Sanders
6605 Grand Montecito Parkway Ste. 200
Las Vegas, NV 89149
Attorneys for Trans Union, LLC
CLARK HILL, PLLC
By: /s/Jeremy J. Thompson
Jeremy J. Thompson, Esq.
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Equifax Information
Services LLC
IT IS SO ORDERED.