Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hedrick, 1:17-cr-0208-TWP-MPB. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20190820d32 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIM A. BAKER , Magistrate Judge . On August 14, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on July 26, 2019. Defendant Hedrick appeared in person with his appointed counsel William Dazey. The government appeared by Peter Blackett, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Felecia Wagner. The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 14, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on July 26, 2019. Defendant Hedrick appeared in person with his appointed counsel William Dazey. The government appeared by Peter Blackett, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Felecia Wagner.

The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Hedrick of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Hedrick orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Hedrick admitted violation numbers 1, and 2. [Docket No. 29.]

3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance 1 "You shall not use or possess any controlled substances prohibited by applicable state or federal law, unless authorized to do so by a valid prescription from a licensed practitioner." Mr. Hedrick tested positive for marijuana on January 29, 2019, and tested positive for synthetic marijuana on June 22, 2019. 2 "You shall reside at the residential reentry center for a term of up to 180 days. You shall abide by the rules and regulations of the facility." The offender has been cited for 22 incident reports, and has been out of place from the facility on at least 4 separate occasions, all in violation of the reentry center's rules.

4. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade C violation. (b) Defendant's criminal history category is III. (c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 5 to 11 months' imprisonment.

5. The parties jointly recommended a sentence of ten (10) months with no supervised release to follow.

The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that his supervised release should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or his designee for a period of ten (10) months with no supervised release to follow. The Defendant is to be taken into custody immediately pending the District Judge's action on this Report and Recommendation.

The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period to object to the Report and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer