Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HOBBS, CR 112-259. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20141014i62 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. To prepare his appeal at the Eleventh Circuit, Defendant filed in this Court a pro se motion for production of transcripts (doc. no. 109) on June 16, 2014, and submitted in this Court a transcript request (doc. no. 113) on July 7, 2014. The Court approved that request (docs. nos. 114, 120, 123) and the requested transcripts were filed in this Court on August 6-7, 2014 (docs. nos. 115, 116, 117, 118, 119). On September 19, 2014, the Eleventh Circuit appoi
More

ORDER

J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge.

To prepare his appeal at the Eleventh Circuit, Defendant filed in this Court a pro se motion for production of transcripts (doc. no. 109) on June 16, 2014, and submitted in this Court a transcript request (doc. no. 113) on July 7, 2014. The Court approved that request (docs. nos. 114, 120, 123) and the requested transcripts were filed in this Court on August 6-7, 2014 (docs. nos. 115, 116, 117, 118, 119). On September 19, 2014, the Eleventh Circuit appointed counsel to represent Defendant. (Doc. no. 126.) The Court therefore DENIES Defendant's motion for production of transcripts (doc. no. 109) as moot.

ORDER ENTERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer