Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pree v. Pickle Pro, LLC, 2:17-cv-42-FtM-29CM. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20171201a07 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER CAROL MIRANDO , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 34) filed on October 6, 2017. On September 6, 2017, the undersigned recommended entry of Clerk's default against Defendant Pickle Pro, LLC ("Pickle Pro") because after its previous counsel withdrew from this case, Pickle Pro did not retain new counsel against the Court's Order to do so. Doc. 30. Senior United States District Judge John E.
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 34) filed on October 6, 2017. On September 6, 2017, the undersigned recommended entry of Clerk's default against Defendant Pickle Pro, LLC ("Pickle Pro") because after its previous counsel withdrew from this case, Pickle Pro did not retain new counsel against the Court's Order to do so. Doc. 30. Senior United States District Judge John E. Steele adopted the Report and Recommendation and directed the Clerk to enter default against Pickle Pro. Doc. 31. Defendants seek to set aside the Clerk's default entered against Pickle Pro, seeking that Defendant Todd Pree, who is proceeding pro se, represent Pickle Pro. Doc. 34. Plaintiffs oppose the requested relief. Doc. 35.

The Court concedes Defendants have appeared in this matter. See generally the Docket. Nonetheless, as the Court noted, Local Rule 2.03(e) permits Pickle Pro to appear and be heard only through counsel admitted to practice in this Court. M.D. Fla. R. 2.03(e); Doc. 30 at 2. Pickle Pro did not retain new counsel in violation of Local Rule 2.03(e) and the Court's Order to retain new counsel, resulting in the Clerk's entry of default against it. Docs. 29, 30, 31, 32. As of this date, Pickle Pro has not retained new counsel, despite having ample opportunity to retain one. See generally the Docket. Thus, the Court does not find good cause to set aside the Clerk's default. See Compania Interamericana Export-Import, S.A. v. Compania Dominicana de Aviacion, 88 F.3d 948, 951-52 (11th Cir. 1996) (upholding the district judge's denial of the motion to set aside entry of default because the corporate defendant failed to obtain counsel due to its alleged financial difficulty).

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby

ORDERED:

Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 34) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer