BARNETT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:12-cv-532. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20130705c67
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 11, 2013 (Doc. 12). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections t
Summary: ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 11, 2013 (Doc. 12). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to..
More
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 11, 2013 (Doc. 12).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
