Luke v. Berryhill, 3:18-CV-00536. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20190314f08
Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) BARBARA B. CRABB , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 , 296 (1993);
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) BARBARA B. CRABB , District Judge . Pursuant to the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 , 296 (1993); ..
More
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
Pursuant to the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters an order under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate and issue a new decision. Additionally, the ALJ will evaluate fibromyalgia pursuant to SSR 12-2p, further evaluate the opinion evidence, further evaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity, further evaluate the claimant's subjective allegations in accordance with SSR 16-3p, and if warranted, obtain additional evidence from a vocational expert.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
