Shelby v. Greystar Management Services, L.P., 2:17-cv-02650-TLP-cgc. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20180730e99
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS L. PARKER , District Judge . This action comes before the Court on Defendant's Notice of Removal, filed on September 6, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Presently, before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by Magistrate Judge Charmiane Claxton. (ECF No. 29.) The R&R recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS L. PARKER , District Judge . This action comes before the Court on Defendant's Notice of Removal, filed on September 6, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Presently, before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by Magistrate Judge Charmiane Claxton. (ECF No. 29.) The R&R recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THOMAS L. PARKER, District Judge.
This action comes before the Court on Defendant's Notice of Removal, filed on September 6, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Presently, before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by Magistrate Judge Charmiane Claxton. (ECF No. 29.) The R&R recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment be denied. (Id. at PageID 164.)
"Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, and the time for filing objections expired on July 13, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2), 6(d), 72(b)(2).
"When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note. After reviewing the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Thus, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
