Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

EDWARDS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-1055. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150709e34 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On June 4, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be AFFIRMED and that this action be DISMISSED. ( See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 19). This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Michael Edwards' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 20). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C.
More

ORDER

On June 4, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be AFFIRMED and that this action be DISMISSED. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 19). This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Michael Edwards' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 20). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Plaintiff raises two specific objections and generally relies on those arguments set forth in his Statement of Specific Errors. Defendant asserts that Plaintiff has not raised any new issues and therefore rests on its prior brief. The Court agrees. Both of Plaintiff's objections were thoroughly considered and overruled in the Report and Recommendation. The Court has therefore carefully considered Plaintiff's two objections, and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that the objections are without merit.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation, Document 19, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Defendant's Objections are hereby OVERRULED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby AFFIRMED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall remove Document 19 from the Court's pending motions list, and enter final judgment in favor of Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer