U.S. v. TRUE, 2:10-CR-715-PMD. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20120710a99
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge. The Court has reviewed Defendant Thomas True's Objection to the government's second proposed redaction and Renewed Motion to Sever. The Court finds that the redacted FBI report contained in its prior Order cures any unfair prejudice to True and adequately protects True's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. Therefore, severance is not warranted and True's Renewed Motion to Sever is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendant Thomas True's Objection to the government's second proposed redaction and Renewed Motion to Sever. The Court finds that the redacted FBI report contained in its prior Order cures any unfair prejudice to True and adequately protects True's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. Therefore, severance is not warranted and True's Renewed Motion to Sever is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
