Fitez-Skeens v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:17-cv-313. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180822e31
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 14), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12), AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This appeal from the denial of Social Security benefits is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 14) filed by Plaintiff Crystal Fitez-Skeens ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 12). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that
Summary: ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 14), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12), AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . This appeal from the denial of Social Security benefits is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 14) filed by Plaintiff Crystal Fitez-Skeens ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 12). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that t..
More
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 14), ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 12), AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS AND TERMINATING THIS CASE
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
This appeal from the denial of Social Security benefits is before the Court on the Objections (Doc. 14) filed by Plaintiff Crystal Fitez-Skeens ("Plaintiff") to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington's Report and Recommendations ("Report") (Doc. 12). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Ovington recommended that the Court affirm the ALJ's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income Disability Insurance Benefits and terminate this case. Plaintiff filed Objections (Doc. 14) to the Report. As the Court deems no response to the Objections necessary, this matter is ripe for review.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections to the Report are not well-taken and are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 12) and AFFIRMS the decision denying Plaintiff's applications for benefits (protectively filed on June 23, —). This case is hereby TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
