Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) LINDA R. READE , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the defendant's motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (docket no. 66). 1 The defendant filed such motion on September 15, 2016. In relevant part, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) provides: The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that . . . in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) LINDA R. READE , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the defendant's motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (docket no. 66). 1 The defendant filed such motion on September 15, 2016. In relevant part, 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) provides: The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that . . . in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced ..
More
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
LINDA R. READE, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendant's motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (docket no. 66).1 The defendant filed such motion on September 15, 2016.
In relevant part, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) provides:
The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that . . . in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [§] 994(o), upon motion of the defendant or the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or on its own motion, the court may reduce the term of imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in [18 U.S.C. §] 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); see also United States v. Auman, 8 F.3d 1268, 1271 (8th Cir. 1993) ("Section 3582(c)(2) is a provision that permits a district court to reduce a term of imprisonment if the sentencing range upon which the term was based is subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission."). In addition, USSG § 1B1.10, in relevant part, states:
In a case in which a defendant is serving a term of imprisonment, and the guideline range applicable to that defendant has subsequently been lowered as a result of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual listed in subsection (d) below, the court may reduce the defendant's term of imprisonment as provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). As required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), any such reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment shall be consistent with this policy statement.
USSG § 1B1.10(a)(1); see also USSG § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1) ("Eligibility for consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is triggered only by an amendment listed in subsection (c) that lowers the applicable guideline range.").
The defendant cites to Amendment 782 (subject to subsection (e)(1)), which is included within USSG § 1B1.10(c). But, Amendment 782 (subject to subsection (e)(1)) took effect on November 1, 2014, and the court sentenced the defendant on September 29, 2015. Hence, when it sentenced the defendant, the court already considered the changes that the United States Sentencing Commission made when it revised the United States Sentencing Guidelines that are applicable to drug trafficking offenses. Moreover, the court is not aware of any legal authority that permits it to impose a different sentence. Accordingly, the defendant's motion to reduce sentence (docket no. 66) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
