THOMPSON v. MAERSK LINE A/S, CV416-002. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20160817a41
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., plaintiff Delrone Thomson's employer, moves to intervene in this personal injury case. Doc. 35. Plaintiffs consent to the intervention (doc. 36), and defendants' failure to respond indicates their acquiescence as well. L.R. 7.5 ("Failure to respond within the applicable time period shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion."). Finding it otherwise supported, the Court GRANTS Ceres' motion to intervene. Doc.
Summary: ORDER G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., plaintiff Delrone Thomson's employer, moves to intervene in this personal injury case. Doc. 35. Plaintiffs consent to the intervention (doc. 36), and defendants' failure to respond indicates their acquiescence as well. L.R. 7.5 ("Failure to respond within the applicable time period shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion."). Finding it otherwise supported, the Court GRANTS Ceres' motion to intervene. Doc. 3..
More
ORDER
G.R. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., plaintiff Delrone Thomson's employer, moves to intervene in this personal injury case. Doc. 35. Plaintiffs consent to the intervention (doc. 36), and defendants' failure to respond indicates their acquiescence as well. L.R. 7.5 ("Failure to respond within the applicable time period shall indicate that there is no opposition to a motion."). Finding it otherwise supported, the Court GRANTS Ceres' motion to intervene. Doc. 35.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
