Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TESTORY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 3:14-cv-886-MJR-DGW. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20150417b82 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER DONALD G. WILKERSON , Magistrate Judge . On April 3, 2015, a discovery dispute conference was held in which Plaintiff and Defendant appeared by counsel. The dispute centers on Plaintiff's medical records related to treatment he received at the Heartland Regional Medical Center ("Heartland RMC") in Marion, Illinois in 2014. Defendant issued a subpoena to Heartland RMC on February 5, 2015 seeking: "Any and all records regarding Lowell Bruce Testory . . . back, spine, hip, or other orth
More

ORDER

On April 3, 2015, a discovery dispute conference was held in which Plaintiff and Defendant appeared by counsel.

The dispute centers on Plaintiff's medical records related to treatment he received at the Heartland Regional Medical Center ("Heartland RMC") in Marion, Illinois in 2014. Defendant issued a subpoena to Heartland RMC on February 5, 2015 seeking: "Any and all records regarding Lowell Bruce Testory . . . back, spine, hip, or other orthopedic injuries from 1/1/2004-Present." In response, Heartland RMC, through the Health Information Management Department, indicated that it was unable to comply because the records are confidential and that they require either a specific waiver or a court order. Plaintiff has indicated that he does not want to sign a waiver because he does not wish to disclose any medical condition unrelated to the accident and medical treatment that are at issue in this case.

In order the move these proceedings along and protect sensitive health information, the following is hereby ORDERED:

1. Heartland RMC is ORDERED to submit to the Court, in a sealed envelope for in camera inspection, the medical records of Lowell Bruce Testory, from April 10, 2011 to the present as described in the attached subpoena by May 4, 2015.1 2. The Court will review the medical records and determine whether any or all of the information is relevant to this matter. 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order (along with the attachments thereto), by certified mail (return receipt requested) to:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The original subpoena requests medical records from January 1, 2004 to the present. The time period has been shortened by Defendants as indicated at the hearing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer