KENNARD P. FOSTER, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the undersigned U. S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order entered by the Honorable Richard L. Young, Chief Judge, on April 16, 2012, designating this Magistrate Judge to conduct a hearing on the Petition for Summons or Warrant for Offender Under Supervision filed with the Court on March 27, 2012, and to submit to Judge Young proposed Findings of Facts and Recommendation for disposition under Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 3401(i) and 3583(e). All proceedings were held April 16, 2012 in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Rule 32.1(a)(1) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Title 18 U.S.C. §3583:
1. Mike Donahoe, Office of the Indiana Federal Community Defender, was present and appointed by the Court to represent Mr. Tyson in regard to the pending Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release.
2. A copy of the Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release was provided to Mr. Tyson and his counsel who informed the Court that they had read and understood the specifications of violations and waived further reading thereof.
3. Mr. Tyson was advised of his right to a preliminary hearing and its purpose in regard to the alleged specified violations of his supervised release contained in the pending Petition.
4. Mr. Tyson was advised he would have a right to question witnesses against him at the preliminary hearing unless the Court, for good cause shown, found that justice did not require the appearance of a witness or witnesses.
5. Mr. Tyson was advised he had the opportunity to appear at the preliminary hearing and present evidence on his own behalf.
6. That if the preliminary hearing resulted in a finding of probable cause that Mr. Tyson had violated an alleged condition or conditions of his supervised release set forth in the Petition, he would be held for a revocation hearing before the undersigned Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Judge Young's designation.
7. Mr. Donahoe stated that Mr. Tyson would stipulate there is a basis in fact to hold him on the specifications of violations of supervised release set forth in the Petition. Mr. Tyson executed a written waiver of the preliminary hearing, which was accepted by the Court.
8. Mr. Tyson, by counsel, stipulated that he committed the specified violations set forth in the Petition for Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision, filed with the Court as follows:
The Court placed Mr. Tyson under oath and directly inquired of Mr. Tyson whether he admitted violations of the specifications of his supervised release set forth above. Mr. Tyson stated that he admitted the above violations as set forth above. The government moved to dismiss specifications numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 contained in the Petition to revoke defendant's supervised release, filed March 27, 2012, and the Court dismissed the same.
Counsel for the parties further stipulated to the following:
The Court, having heard the admissions of the defendant, the stipulations of the parties, and the arguments and discussions on behalf of each party,
The Magistrate Judge requests that Mark McCleese, U. S. Parole and Probation Officer, prepare for submission to the Honorable Richard L. Young, Chief Judge, as soon as practicable, a supervised release revocation judgment, in accordance with these findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendation.
Counsel for the parties and Mr. Tyson stipulated in open court waiver of the following:
Counsel for the parties and Mr. Tyson entered the above stipulations and waivers after being notified by the undersigned Magistrate Judge that the District Court may refuse to accept the stipulations and waivers and conduct a revocation hearing pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §3561 et seq. and Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and may reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, including making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report or specified proposed findings or recommendation upon which he may reconsider.
WHEREFORE, the U. S. Magistrate Judge
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.