FARLOW v. CABE, 5:12-CV-113 (MTT). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120622a23
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 11). The Defendants separately have filed Motions to Dismiss. (Docs. 7, 10). The Court has reviewed the Motions to Dismiss, and does not find sufficient grounds to stay discovery. Accordingly, the Joint Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED. The Parties are to submit a Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order by in accordance with the Court's Rules 16 and 26 Order. T
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 11). The Defendants separately have filed Motions to Dismiss. (Docs. 7, 10). The Court has reviewed the Motions to Dismiss, and does not find sufficient grounds to stay discovery. Accordingly, the Joint Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED. The Parties are to submit a Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order by in accordance with the Court's Rules 16 and 26 Order. Th..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery. (Doc. 11). The Defendants separately have filed Motions to Dismiss. (Docs. 7, 10). The Court has reviewed the Motions to Dismiss, and does not find sufficient grounds to stay discovery. Accordingly, the Joint Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED. The Parties are to submit a Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order by in accordance with the Court's Rules 16 and 26 Order. This Order does not affect the briefing schedules on the Motions to Dismiss.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
