Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tucker v. Drew, Eckl & Farnham, LLP, 1:18-cv-00891-AT-CMS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20180710978 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER AMY TOTENBERG , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 29] and the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Moore, Burke, and Craig [Doc. 17]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff's claims against the Individual Defendants in their individual capacities be dismissed. No objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 29] and the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Moore, Burke, and Craig [Doc. 17]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff's claims against the Individual Defendants in their individual capacities be dismissed.

No objections have been filed in response to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation for clear error and finds none. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. For the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court GRANTS the Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 17] and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's ADA claims against Defendants, Brian Thomas Moore, Paul W. Burke, and Emily Craig.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer