Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Abbott v. Bragdon, 96-1644 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 96-1644 Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 07, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 108 F.3d 328, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.Sidney ABBOTT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.Randon BRAGDON, D.M.D., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., PER CURIAM. See Abbott v. Bragdon, No. 96-1643.

108 F.3d 328

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Sidney ABBOTT, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
Randon BRAGDON, D.M.D., Defendant, Appellee.

No. 96-1644.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

March 5, 1997.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]

David G. Webbert and Bennett H. Klein, with whom Johnson, Webbert & Laubenstein and Gay and Lesbian Advocates were on brief, for plaintiff Sidney Abbott.

John W. McCarthy, with whom Brent A. Singer and Rudman & Winchell were on brief, for defendant Randon Bragdon, D.M.D.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge, and STAHL, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is a protective appeal, taken by a prevailing plaintiff as a precaution, should we see fit to reverse or vacate a summary judgment entered in her favor by the district court. We have today issued an opinion affirming the summary judgment. See Abbott v. Bragdon, No. 96-1643. We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot.

2

Appeal dismissed. No costs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer