JOHNSON v. U.S., CR413-065. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20170203e58
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 8). After a careful de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. As a result. Petitioner's Motion to Modify and Correct Sentence (Doc. 1), which this Court construed 1 as seeking
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 8). After a careful de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. As a result. Petitioner's Motion to Modify and Correct Sentence (Doc. 1), which this Court construed 1 as seeking r..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 8). After a careful de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that Petitioner's objections are without merit. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. As a result. Petitioner's Motion to Modify and Correct Sentence (Doc. 1), which this Court construed1 as seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. As made clear in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner cannot use Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 to attack his sentence and his request actually seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Source: Leagle
