Williams v. United States, 3:17-cv-00153-JPG-MAB. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20190710888
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 43) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding five different motions in this case. (ECF No. 67.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 43) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding five different motions in this case. (ECF No. 67.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections a..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 43) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding five different motions in this case. (ECF No. 67.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
Here, no party has filed an objection. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds no clear error in the Report. Accordingly, the Court:
• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 67);
• GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52);
• DENIES the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54);
• FINDS AS MOOT the defendants' motion to strike (ECF No. 56);
• DENIES the defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 58); and
• DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to entry judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
