Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Derrick Snider has moved for the appointment of new counsel in this matter. Doc. 35. Because this case is currently scheduled for sentencing on February 22, 2019, the Court held an ex parte inquiry hearing on February 7, 2019. Julianne Glisson has been serving as his court-appointed lawyer, but Snider wants to replace her even though he agreed at the hearing that Glisson negotiated a favorable plea agreement on his behalf. "Althoug
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Derrick Snider has moved for the appointment of new counsel in this matter. Doc. 35. Because this case is currently scheduled for sentencing on February 22, 2019, the Court held an ex parte inquiry hearing on February 7, 2019. Julianne Glisson has been serving as his court-appointed lawyer, but Snider wants to replace her even though he agreed at the hearing that Glisson negotiated a favorable plea agreement on his behalf. "Although..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER L. RAY, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Derrick Snider has moved for the appointment of new counsel in this matter. Doc. 35. Because this case is currently scheduled for sentencing on February 22, 2019, the Court held an ex parte inquiry hearing on February 7, 2019. Julianne Glisson has been serving as his court-appointed lawyer, but Snider wants to replace her even though he agreed at the hearing that Glisson negotiated a favorable plea agreement on his behalf.
"Although an indigent criminal defendant has a right to be represented by counsel, he does not have a right . . . to demand a different appointed lawyer except for good cause." United States v. Young, 482 F.2d 993, 995 (5th Cir. 1973)1; Thomas v. Wainwright, 767 F.2d 732, 742 (11th Cir. 1985); see Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 11-15 (1983) (declining to create a Sixth Amendment right to a "meaningful attorney-client relationship"). Good cause for a substitution requires a showing that a defendant's appointed counsel cannot provide adequate assistance. Typical grounds include a conflict of interest, a complete breakdown in communication, or an irreconcilable conflict between counsel and his client. Young, 482 F.2d at 995.
At the hearing, it became obvious that there existed a near-absolute breakdown in the attorney-client relationship between Snider and Glisson. In addition to filing this motion, Snider has also filed a bar complaint against Glisson. Meanwhile, Ms. Glisson is concerned for her safety when visiting her client. While defendant's motion follows his guilty plea and comes late in the proceedings, the Court, having exhaustively inquired into the merits of the motion, is convinced that the "conflict [is] so great that it [has] resulted in a total lack of communication between the defendant and his counsel" and would likely undermine his defense at sentencing. United States v. Oliver, 316 F. App'x 877, 880 (11th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314, 1343 (11th Cir. 1997)). Given such a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, defendant's motion for new counsel is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
