U.S. v. Beasley, 2:18 CR 126. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20190628b65
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES T. MOODY , District Judge . Defendant moved to suppress evidence. (DE # 15.) This court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Joshua P. Kolar for a report and recommendation (DE # 25), who conducted an evidentiary hearing (DE # 28) and subsequently recommended denial of the motion to suppress (DE # 30). The parties were informed that they had 14 days within which to file an objection to the report and recommendation, but that time period has expired and no objections have bee
Summary: ORDER JAMES T. MOODY , District Judge . Defendant moved to suppress evidence. (DE # 15.) This court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Joshua P. Kolar for a report and recommendation (DE # 25), who conducted an evidentiary hearing (DE # 28) and subsequently recommended denial of the motion to suppress (DE # 30). The parties were informed that they had 14 days within which to file an objection to the report and recommendation, but that time period has expired and no objections have been..
More
ORDER
JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.
Defendant moved to suppress evidence. (DE # 15.) This court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Joshua P. Kolar for a report and recommendation (DE # 25), who conducted an evidentiary hearing (DE # 28) and subsequently recommended denial of the motion to suppress (DE # 30). The parties were informed that they had 14 days within which to file an objection to the report and recommendation, but that time period has expired and no objections have been filed.
Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS the report and recommendation (DE # 30) and DENIES the motion to suppress (DE # 15).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
