Carr v. Zmuda, 1:17-CV-00167-CWD. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20180613d14
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT CANDY W. DALE , Magistrate Judge . This prisoner case was initially screened by the Magistrate Court, pursuant to the Court's then-standing general order assigning all prisoners cases to the Magistrate Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. After screening, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017), which held that the consent of all named parties is required before a Magistrate Judge can enter a screenin
Summary: ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT CANDY W. DALE , Magistrate Judge . This prisoner case was initially screened by the Magistrate Court, pursuant to the Court's then-standing general order assigning all prisoners cases to the Magistrate Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. After screening, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017), which held that the consent of all named parties is required before a Magistrate Judge can enter a screening..
More
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT
CANDY W. DALE, Magistrate Judge.
This prisoner case was initially screened by the Magistrate Court, pursuant to the Court's then-standing general order assigning all prisoners cases to the Magistrate Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. After screening, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017), which held that the consent of all named parties is required before a Magistrate Judge can enter a screening order dismissing any parties or claims or any other order of finality. Because not all named parties had consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge at the time of screening, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall reassign this case in its entirety to a United States District Judge for de novo review.
Source: Leagle
