JEAN-LOUIS v. CLEAR SPRINGS FARMING, LLC, 8:13-cv-3084-T-30AEP. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20151218b73
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Strike and/or Exclude Declarations of Jean Claude Joseph and Michel Desulme (Dkt. 164) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Dkt. 166). Upon consideration of the motion, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, the Court grants the motion only to the extent that it seeks the alternative relief of being permitted to depose Joseph and Desulme. It is therefore ORDERED an
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Strike and/or Exclude Declarations of Jean Claude Joseph and Michel Desulme (Dkt. 164) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Dkt. 166). Upon consideration of the motion, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, the Court grants the motion only to the extent that it seeks the alternative relief of being permitted to depose Joseph and Desulme. It is therefore ORDERED and..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Strike and/or Exclude Declarations of Jean Claude Joseph and Michel Desulme (Dkt. 164) and Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition (Dkt. 166). Upon consideration of the motion, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, the Court grants the motion only to the extent that it seeks the alternative relief of being permitted to depose Joseph and Desulme.
It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion to Strike and/or Exclude Declarations of Jean Claude Joseph and Michel Desulme (Dkt. 164) is granted to the extent that Defendants may depose Joseph and Desulme prior to the Court's ruling on Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 153). The Motion to Strike is otherwise denied.
2. The depositions of Joseph and Desulme shall occur within sixty (60) days of this Order.
3. Defendants shall file a supplement to their Reply (Dkt. 162) within thirty (30) days of Joseph and Desulme's depositions.
4. The Court defers ruling on Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 153) until after the filing of Defendants' Supplemental Reply.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
