Parish v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-cv-294. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190709c25
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2019
Summary: OPINiON AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 14, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court overrule Michael Ray Parish's ("Plaintiff") statement of errors and affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding. ECF No. 18. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). R&R 13-14, ECF No. 18. The R&R furt
Summary: OPINiON AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 14, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court overrule Michael Ray Parish's ("Plaintiff") statement of errors and affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding. ECF No. 18. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). R&R 13-14, ECF No. 18. The R&R furth..
More
OPINiON AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On June 14, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court overrule Michael Ray Parish's ("Plaintiff") statement of errors and affirm the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") non-disability finding. ECF No. 18.
The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). R&R 13-14, ECF No. 18. The R&R further advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's statement of errors is OVERRULED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. The clerk is directed to enter Judgment in favor of the Commissioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
