Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARELLANO-CAMPOS v. ALLEN, 1:11-CV-3911-TWT. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20120725c52 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge. This is a pro se habeas corpus action by a state prisoner. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Petition be denied and dismissed on the merits. The Petitioner's objections are little more than statements that he disagrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well reasoned Report and Recomm
More

ORDER

THOMAS W. THRASH, Jr., District Judge.

This is a pro se habeas corpus action by a state prisoner. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Petition be denied and dismissed on the merits. The Petitioner's objections are little more than statements that he disagrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Georgia Court of Appeals properly rejected Petitioner's claims of insufficiency of evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. See Arellano-Campos v. State, 307 Ga.App. 561 (2011). The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. This action is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer