Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STATE v. HECTOR, 138 So.3d 1063 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals of Florida Number: inflco20140430245 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM. Defendant Jordan Hector and co-defendant Francisco Brock were charged with one count of fraud under section 440.105(4)(b)9., Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that, as the State was unable to prove that the defendants obtained employment for the purpose of workers' compensation benefits, and that they had neither claimed, filed for, nor received workers' compensation benefits, the defendants' motion to dismiss was "well taken
More

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Jordan Hector and co-defendant Francisco Brock were charged with one count of fraud under section 440.105(4)(b)9., Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that, as the State was unable to prove that the defendants obtained employment for the purpose of workers' compensation benefits, and that they had neither claimed, filed for, nor received workers' compensation benefits, the defendants' motion to dismiss was "well taken and appropriate for granting."

For the reasons set forth in this court's opinion in State v. Brock, No. 4D13-962, 2014 WL 1686448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), we reverse the trial court's order dismissing the fraud charge and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

GROSS, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer