GUNELLS v. COLVIN, 5:14-CV-188 (MTT). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20150918f69
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 21). The Magistrate Judge recommends affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Plaintiff Mark Jay Gunells's application for benefits. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation, and the Commissioner has responded (Docs. 22, 23). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recomme
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 21). The Magistrate Judge recommends affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Plaintiff Mark Jay Gunells's application for benefits. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation, and the Commissioner has responded (Docs. 22, 23). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommen..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 21). The Magistrate Judge recommends affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Plaintiff Mark Jay Gunells's application for benefits. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation, and the Commissioner has responded (Docs. 22, 23). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects.1 The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court is satisfied that the ALJ's failure to explicitly assign weight to the opinions of the physicians is harmless error under Winschel v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 631 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2011). See Denomme v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 518 F. App'x 875 (11th Cir. 2013).
Source: Leagle
