welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
  4. 2019
  5. Berkery v. Equifax Information Services LLC, 18-3417. (2019)

Berkery v. Equifax Information Services LLC, 18-3417. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20191223f14 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 31), the response in opposition (Doc. Nos. 34, 36), 1 Mr. Berkery's Motion to Strike with Prejudice Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32), the response in opposition (Doc. No. 35), and the reply in support (Doc. No. 37), it is ORDERED that: 1. Mr. Berkery's Motion to Strike (Doc. No.
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 31), the response in opposition (Doc. Nos. 34, 36),1 Mr. Berkery's Motion to Strike with Prejudice Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32), the response in opposition (Doc. No. 35), and the reply in support (Doc. No. 37), it is ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Berkery's Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 32) is DENIED. 2. The defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31) is DENIED.

FootNotes


1. Mr. Berkery filed a response in opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss on May 20, 2019. (Doc. No. 34). On June 4, 2019, he filed an "amended response in opposition" to the defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 36). The Court construes both documents as Mr. Berkery's response in opposition.

As noted in the memorandum, Mr. Berkery filed two memoranda in support of his motion to strike which include substantive arguments opposing the defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 32 at 3-8; Doc. No. 33.) He resubmitted these documents in his response in opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 34). The Court considers Mr. Berkery's substantive arguments contained in the two memoranda in ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
18-3417.
Counsels
  • JESSICA REILLY
  • BENJAMIN T. VERNEY
  • MOHAMMAD A. GHIASUDDIN
  • SCOTT EDWIN BRADY
  • CASEY GREEN
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer