Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Long, 1:16-00139-TWP-DML. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20190613b93 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER TANYA WALTON PRATT , District Judge . On January 16, 2019 Defendant Daemaz L. Long ("Mr. Long") filed a Motion to Reduce Sentence (Dkt. 74) under the First Step Act of 2018. Federal Community Defender Counsel ("FCD") was directed to appear and the case was stayed. (Dkt. 75.) Then, Mr. Long, pro se, filed another motion titled Petition for Recommendation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S 3629(c)(1)(2) and 3621 (E) R.D.A.P. Completion for RRC and Home Confinement Placement. (Dkt. 77.) The Court
More

ORDER

On January 16, 2019 Defendant Daemaz L. Long ("Mr. Long") filed a Motion to Reduce Sentence (Dkt. 74) under the First Step Act of 2018. Federal Community Defender Counsel ("FCD") was directed to appear and the case was stayed. (Dkt. 75.) Then, Mr. Long, pro se, filed another motion titled Petition for Recommendation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.S 3629(c)(1)(2) and 3621 (E) R.D.A.P. Completion for RRC and Home Confinement Placement. (Dkt. 77.) The Court issued an order instructing the Government that it did not need to respond to Dkt. 77 unless that motion was adopted by defense counsel. It was not adopted. Instead, FCD withdrew and the Court issued an Order directing Mr. Long to supplement his motion and the Government was to respond to Mr. Long's motion and any supplement within 14 days thereafter. See Dkt. 83. Mr. Long has not filed a supplement.

The Government shall respond by June 26, 2019 and indicate whether it opposes the relief Mr. Long seeks in his pro se motions, and, if it does, the reasons for its opposition.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer