Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Badger, 1:17-cr-00191-TWP-TAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20190910814 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER TANYA WALTON PRATT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Rhonda Badger's pro se Motion for credit time (Dkt. 60). In her motion, Ms. Badger writes that she "was detained by the Federal Government on April 27, 2017 on a WRIT from the Indiana Department of Correction[]. When I entered into the BOP on July 19, 2018 I was only granted jail credit from December 2, 2017 to July 18, 2018." She is requesting credit for "days from April 27, 2017 to December 1, 2017
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Rhonda Badger's pro se Motion for credit time (Dkt. 60). In her motion, Ms. Badger writes that she "was detained by the Federal Government on April 27, 2017 on a WRIT from the Indiana Department of Correction[]. When I entered into the BOP on July 19, 2018 I was only granted jail credit from December 2, 2017 to July 18, 2018." She is requesting credit for "days from April 27, 2017 to December 1, 2017".

The Government opposes the request and argues that Ms. Badger is seeking to receive credit for days that were already being served on another criminal matter out of Hancock County, Indiana (Cause No. 30D01-1307-FC-000992, (Dkt. 62). The Government explains that Ms. Badger committed the instant offense on or between August 1, 2016 and December 1, 2016, while she was on probation for trafficking with an inmate. That probationary period ran from March 24, 2015 until February 1, 2017, when her probation was revoked for a violation. Because Ms. Badger committed the instant offense while she was on probation in Hancock County, the only way for the Court to grant her the days that she requests as credit (for the time period of April 25, 2017 to December 1, 2017) would be to give her credit for the days that the Hancock County Superior Court ordered her to serve at the Department of Correction.

The Court is persuaded by the Government's argument. Ms. Badger was on probation when she committed the instant offense. To receive double credit (credit towards both this case and the Hancock County case at the same time) is to diminish the punishment for both crimes and would ignore the fact that Ms. Badger was under the supervision of two separate jurisdictions when she committed her offenses against the Minor Victim.

Accordingly, Ms. Badger's pro se Motion for credit time (Dkt. [60]) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer