Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. OCHOA-GUERRA, 8:12CR39. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20120330829 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Daniel Ochoa-Guerra (Ochoa-Guerra) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 23). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 17) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant: (1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Und
More

ORDER

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Daniel Ochoa-Guerra (Ochoa-Guerra) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 23). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 17) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant:

(1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Understands that the time sought by the extension may be excluded from any calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.; and (3) With this understanding and knowledge, agrees to the filing of the motion. Accordingly, the motion (Filing No. 23) is: (X) Held in abeyance pending compliance with NECrimR 12.1(a) and Paragraph 9 of the Progression Order. Absent compliance on or before April 4, 2012, the motion will be deemed withdrawn and termed on the docket. ( ) Denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer