U.S. v. FRANKLIN, 2:17-cr-13. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20170808b98
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . The Court conducted an independent and de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's July 11, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 22, to which Defendant Douglas Franklin ("Franklin") did not object. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and DENIES Franklin's Motion to Suppress Evidence, dkt. no. 14. Assuming that the Government establishes all other requirements of admissibility, the Government s
Summary: ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD , District Judge . The Court conducted an independent and de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's July 11, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 22, to which Defendant Douglas Franklin ("Franklin") did not object. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and DENIES Franklin's Motion to Suppress Evidence, dkt. no. 14. Assuming that the Government establishes all other requirements of admissibility, the Government sh..
More
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, District Judge.
The Court conducted an independent and de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's July 11, 2017, Report and Recommendation, dkt. no. 22, to which Defendant Douglas Franklin ("Franklin") did not object. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and DENIES Franklin's Motion to Suppress Evidence, dkt. no. 14. Assuming that the Government establishes all other requirements of admissibility, the Government shall be entitled to use the evidence discovered during the traffic stop as evidence in the trial of this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
