FOX v. CITY OF ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 6:15-cv-157-Orl-41DAB. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150922732
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency, which the Court construes as Plaintiff's third motion to proceed in forma pauperis (the "Motion," Doc. 18). United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19), which, for the third time, recommends that Plaintiff's request be denied. Additionally, in light of Plaintiff's failure to resolve the deficiencies in his pleading and to comply
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency, which the Court construes as Plaintiff's third motion to proceed in forma pauperis (the "Motion," Doc. 18). United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19), which, for the third time, recommends that Plaintiff's request be denied. Additionally, in light of Plaintiff's failure to resolve the deficiencies in his pleading and to comply ..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency, which the Court construes as Plaintiff's third motion to proceed in forma pauperis (the "Motion," Doc. 18). United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19), which, for the third time, recommends that Plaintiff's request be denied. Additionally, in light of Plaintiff's failure to resolve the deficiencies in his pleading and to comply with prior Orders (Doc. Nos. 12, 16), Judge Baker also recommends that this Court dismiss the [Second] Amended Complaint (Doc. 17), without leave to amend.
After an independent de novo review of the record and noting that no objections were timely filed, this Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Motion (Doc. 18) is DENIED.
3. The [Second] Amended Complaint (Doc. 17) is DISMISSED.
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
