Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Maldonado-Ortega, 10-10104-JTM. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20191107c31 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN , District Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's request for the appointment of a representative from the Federal Public Defender's Officer (Dkt. 49) to assist with a determination of whether defendant is entitled to relief pursuant to Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019). On June 27, 2019, Chief United States District Judge Julie A. Robinson signed Standing Order 19-2 In re: Rehaif v. US, 588 U.S. ___, N
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the defendant's request for the appointment of a representative from the Federal Public Defender's Officer (Dkt. 49) to assist with a determination of whether defendant is entitled to relief pursuant to Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019). On June 27, 2019, Chief United States District Judge Julie A. Robinson signed Standing Order 19-2 In re: Rehaif v. US, 588 U.S. ___, No. 17-9560 (2019). Standing Order 19-2 appoints the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Kansas to represent any defendant previously determined to have been entitled to appointment of counsel, or who is now indigent, to determine whether that defendant is qualified to seek relief under the Rehaif decision. Defendant was previously determined to have been entitled to appointment of counsel and was represented by the Office of the Federal Public Defender in prior proceedings in this matter.

Pursuant to Standing Order 19-2, the court appoints the Office of the Federal Public Defender to determine whether defendant qualifies to seek relief under the Rehaif decision. If the Federal Public Defender's Office determines that there is a prohibitive conflict of interest, the Office shall so notify this court, who may then appoint a member of the Criminal Justice Panel to represent defendant. Any such appointment shall be to determine whether defendant qualifies for any post-conviction relief pursuant to Rehaif, and, if so, to assist defendant in obtaining such relief. The appointment shall terminate upon a determination by counsel that defendant is not eligible for relief under Rehaif, or, if eligible for relief, upon exhaustion of defendant's post-conviction remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer