Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Triplett, 1:16-cr-0195-SEB-MJD. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20190701a25 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DORIS L. PRYOR , Magistrate Judge . On June 13, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on April 29, 2019 and a supplemental petition filed on May 16, 2019. Defendant Triplett appeared in person with his appointed counsel Loren Collins. The government appeared by MaryAnn Mindrum, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Troy Adamson. The Court conducted the f
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On June 13, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on April 29, 2019 and a supplemental petition filed on May 16, 2019. Defendant Triplett appeared in person with his appointed counsel Loren Collins. The government appeared by MaryAnn Mindrum, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Troy Adamson.

The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Triplett of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Triplett orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Triplett admitted violation number 1. [Docket No. 24.] Government moved to dismiss violation numbers 2, and 3 and the same granted.

3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance 1 "The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime." On April 25, 2019, Mr. Triplett was charged in Marion County, Indiana, with 9 counts of Theft of new laptops from his employer, Eli Lilly. The total loss amount from Eli Lilly is $9,491. According to the probable cause affidavit, the offender pawned the stolen laptops to obtain cash. He is charged in Marion County under cause number 49G09-1904-F6-015922. A warrant was issued for his arrest.

4. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation. (b) Defendant's criminal history category is V. (c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 18 to 24 months' imprisonment.

5. The parties jointly recommended a sentence of twenty (20) months with no supervised release to follow. Defendant requested placement at FCI Terre Haute.

The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that his supervised release should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or his designee for a period of twenty (20) months with no supervised release to follow. The Defendant is to be taken into custody immediately pending the District Judge's action on this Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge will make a recommendation of placement at FCI Terre Haute.

The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period to object to the Report and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer