Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Luster v. United States, 5:03-cr-00105-TES-CHW-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia Number: infdco20191118880 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TILMAN E. SELF, III , District Judge . After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] issued by the United States Magistrate Judge on October 29, 2019, is hereby ADOPTED and MADE ORDER OF THE COURT. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The Court considered Movant's Objection [Doc. 73] and finds that it lacks merit. Movant's Motions to Arrest Judgment [Docs. 69, 70] substantively constitute second or successive col
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] issued by the United States Magistrate Judge on October 29, 2019, is hereby ADOPTED and MADE ORDER OF THE COURT. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court considered Movant's Objection [Doc. 73] and finds that it lacks merit. Movant's Motions to Arrest Judgment [Docs. 69, 70] substantively constitute second or successive collateral attacks of his convictions. Since Movant did not seek authorization from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and DISMISSES his Motions.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer