In re Charleston Associates, LLC, 10-1452-LBR. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151118b22
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2015
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND CITY NATIONAL BANK'S AND RA SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY'S DEADLINE TO FILE BRIEFS Appeal Reference No. 14-01. (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . City National Bank (" CNB ") and RA Southeast Land Company, LLC ("RAS", together with CNB (the " Movants "), move pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 8013 and 8018 for entry of an order extending the deadline, if there is one, for Movants to file and serve their response to Statement of Appellant Charleston Associates
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND CITY NATIONAL BANK'S AND RA SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY'S DEADLINE TO FILE BRIEFS Appeal Reference No. 14-01. (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . City National Bank (" CNB ") and RA Southeast Land Company, LLC ("RAS", together with CNB (the " Movants "), move pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 8013 and 8018 for entry of an order extending the deadline, if there is one, for Movants to file and serve their response to Statement of Appellant Charleston Associates,..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND CITY NATIONAL BANK'S AND RA SOUTHEAST LAND COMPANY'S DEADLINE TO FILE BRIEFS Appeal Reference No. 14-01. (First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
City National Bank ("CNB") and RA Southeast Land Company, LLC ("RAS", together with CNB (the "Movants"), move pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 8013 and 8018 for entry of an order extending the deadline, if there is one, for Movants to file and serve their response to Statement of Appellant Charleston Associates, LLC in Lieu of Opening Brief [Docket 32], in accordance with this Court's September 23, 2015 Minute Order (Docket No. 29). Counsel for CNB represents that Appellant Charleston Associates, LLC does not oppose an extension of time to and including December 1, 2015. It is the position of RAS that since no Opening Brief was filed by Charleston Associates, LLC, that there is no deadline to file an Answering Brief.
This is CNB's and RAS's first request for an extension.
Movants submit there is good cause for the requested extension because Movants have to determine the proper response to a statement in lieu of opening brief, a document not authorized by rules or case law, and counsel is preparing for a November 17, 2015 oral argument before the Ninth Circuit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
